Popular Post

1976 Lamborghini Silhouette

1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • MacFan782040
    Jul 19, 11:45 PM
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5a/IPod_sales_quarterly.png





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Lamborghini Silhouette 1976-78
  • Lamborghini Silhouette 1976-78



  • InsanelyApple
    Feb 26, 11:49 AM
    Why do Americans harbor hate for diesel? I'm not very familiar with the differences between the fuels, other than gasoline is more refined.

    Well, diesel exhaust smells worse than gasoline exhaust. (Personal Experience)





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Lamborghini Silhouette 1976
  • Lamborghini Silhouette 1976



  • Full of Win
    Mar 23, 03:00 AM
    Good. The classic controls are far superior IMO when using quickly and trying not to look at it. This is the reason I will not purchase an iPod touch for use in the car.

    I've used iOS since June 2007 and it had never even got close to the perfection of the click wheel. When I go on any trip of more than 100 miles, I always take my 60 GB 5th Gen iPod. For me, part of it is space - but it's mostly for I/O.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco P300
  • 1976 Lamborghini Urraco P300



  • rdowns
    Apr 21, 12:43 PM
    Amazing that a thread on whether or not a person CAN drive a stick shift car has turned into a full blown debate on the merits of automatic vs manual transmissions. Personally I think this argument is similar to the Mac vs PC argument that has gone on for years, ultimately they're different, and a person should be able to use whichever one (or both) they choose for their own personal reasons. In both cases, transmissions and personal computers, they have their good points and their bad points. To each their own...


    This is MacRumors. Members will argue everything.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. photo LAMBORGHINI SILHOUETTE
  • photo LAMBORGHINI SILHOUETTE



  • Lord Blackadder
    Feb 22, 07:06 PM
    I'm not a big fan of GM on the whole, but credit where credit is due, as the company considers selling a diesel-engined version (http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2011/02/general_motors_considers_at_di.html) of the Chevy Cruze in the US.

    In Europe, Australia and Asia, where GM already sells diesel versions of the Cruze, the diesel is the most fuel-efficient offering. Based on European versions of the car, an American diesel Cruze would probably get about 37 miles per gallon city/48 highway. That would give the Cruze similar mileage numbers to Toyota's Prius hybrid.

    "That number probably would be achievable," said Mike Omotoso, an analyst in Detroit with survey and research group J.D. Power & Associates.

    Omotoso said bringing a diesel Cruze to North America in a year makes some sense. The Cruze will be facing tough competition at that time from Ford's upcoming electric Focus and potential hybrid versions of the Honda Civic and Hyundai Elantra. So a diesel with great fuel economy could get a lot of attention.

    "Volkswagen has been very successful with their diesel engine in the Jetta," Omotoso said. "It's about time that someone provided them with some competition."

    EDIT: Another news article (http://rumors.automobilemag.com/diesel-rumor-2013-chevrolet-cruze-turbo-diesel-4-20279.html) about the Cruze diesel from Automobile Magazine.

    The only real argument against doing it is the cost of federalizing the engine plus the lingering (and ridiculous) diesel-hate that automakers are convinced most Americans harbor. But considering that a) the diesel version of the Cruze already exists in other markets, and b) the car equals the Prius' fuel economy numbers, the case for selling it here is pretty strong IMO.

    Perhaps a successful diesel Cruze will convince GM to put a diesel engine in the Volt, further improving that car's fuel economy? I think the US is ripe for a more wholehearted embrace of the diesel engine in passenger cars and light trucks.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Uracco 3000 #39;Silhouette#39;
  • 1976 Lamborghini Uracco 3000 #39;Silhouette#39;



  • HahaHaha321
    Apr 2, 07:22 PM
    Great concept, I love it. But it was poorly executed. Who picked the music for this ad? It's terrible. And the voiceover is on the verge of creepy.

    I miss old Apple ads. Their advertising is going downhill while their products keep getting better.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Lamborghini Silhouette (1976)
  • Lamborghini Silhouette (1976)



  • Anawrahta
    Sep 6, 06:07 PM
    can they just announce the new MBPs already??

    who cares about the movie store....OooH wow~! $10 movies, you can go to best buy and get a physical copy for just a little bit more. I sure hope this service will let you burn the movies to dvd otherwise it's dead to me.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • ciTiger
    May 2, 06:06 PM
    That's a very nice feature! Too bad it won't work for apps not from the app store...





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. the Lambo Silhouette,
  • the Lambo Silhouette,



  • KnightWRX
    Apr 10, 06:52 PM
    And two-seaters?? :eek: Well, let's not go there.

    Hey, my Street Bob is a 2 seater. :mad:





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • jav6454
    Mar 24, 04:09 PM
    What history? Developing crappy integrated graphics?

    I missed writing "SMALL performance edge".

    My assessment is not based on a small performance edge. It is based on Fusion enabling a whole new set of functionality thanks to OpenCL and DirectX 11 class hardware.

    I established my preference BEFORE watching that video. That Sandy Bridge performs so poor in that demo just confirms my choice.

    You got it wrong.

    Zacate, Brazos and pretty much every Fusion platform does not compete against Sandy Bridge. No...

    It competes against Intel's Atom platform. Atom CPU offerings beat the many of the offerings on the AMD side. However, on the GPU side, AMD has got Intel really well.

    Anandtech did a nice little article on this. They found the whole Fusion concept and implementation as a whole beats Intel's Atom implementation overall for the HTPC. However, down to specifics, well I just discussed it.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini
  • 1976 Lamborghini



  • Object-X
    Sep 1, 12:08 PM
    hopefully it's going to look like this:

    56364

    I agree, I want an iMac like computer with the aluminum housing; looks better on my desk! ;)

    At any rate, hopefully the form factor will be thinner. I can see the 17" eventually being relegated to eMac status.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • eleven59
    Mar 25, 11:37 PM
    Not really. Properly designed controls on touch screen will be just fine... You will see...

    Anyone who thinks that the long-term viability of the IOS ecosystem as a significant home game player because of the lack of hard controls is just missing the picture.

    I can't figure out why some people think you have to look at the screen of a touchscreen device to use it to manipulate things in a game world. Between rotation and movement of the device itself with properly placed buttons you can do a lot with it, none of it requiring looking at the touch screen.

    I suspect most people could distinguish between the lower left corner of their device and the upper right corner, for instance, without looking at the screen.

    FINALLY!! Someone else who has a brain that can adapt and learn with some training. Does no one else know that your brain would learn where to place the hands, thumbs and fingers without looking?? Just takes a smart UI designer to place virtual buttons in smart places.... And if all you needed to do for an attack is make a certain gesture like swipe or a circle, do you really need to look down to do that??. Add that to tilts and motion control and you could do more than just racing games....





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 43
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 43



  • lordonuthin
    Mar 5, 06:22 PM
    this is for F@H right? im keen to start up with my numerous amounts of computers.

    where do i start? everything is all console based :(

    oh wait its an installer thingo.. it wants a key hekp1

    You can start here (http://folding.stanford.edu/), ask questions if you need any help or faster - google your question. It's a learning process but most people don't have any problems. AND thanks for joining the team (3446) that is.

    Remember to set the machines so they don't sleep ... :p





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Lamborghini Silhouette
  • Lamborghini Silhouette



  • miniroll32
    Jun 24, 07:47 AM
    Presenting...

    the iMacPadPodPhoneMiniNano-S





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1978 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 1978 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • boncellis
    Sep 6, 07:35 PM
    There has to be something in the cards that Apple plans to implement that will trump Amazon. I just don't think it will be the iPod this time. What's in store, I wonder...





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 329 Lamborghini Silhouette
  • 329 Lamborghini Silhouette



  • gugy
    Sep 1, 12:57 PM
    Great,
    Thanks for waking me up multimedia:D

    I never really care for the Imac. As a second computer is great, but for me I rather have a Mac Pro. I am glad is possible to do that now.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Detail on 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 40002
  • Detail on 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 40002



  • Multimedia
    Nov 22, 10:45 PM
    Quad-core chips (and octo-core systems) are available now from the other top tier Intel vendors. Apple not included.Typical. Are they 2.33 and 2.66GHz models Aiden? Got links?

    SideNote: The Madonna Concert in HD on NBC tonight is groundbreaking broadcast television. One of the most amazing telecasts I have ever seen-heard. I am a huge Madonna fan though. :D Tony Bennett's special last night also on NBC was an amazing HD composition as well.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. Detail on 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 40002
  • Detail on 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette 40002



  • Peterkro
    Mar 21, 06:09 PM
    Run! Run for the collines!

    Grim but accurate.





    1976 Lamborghini Silhouette. 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette Photo #39;1976 Lamborghini Silhouette#39; - MotorShout
  • 1976 Lamborghini Silhouette Photo #39;1976 Lamborghini Silhouette#39; - MotorShout



  • twoodcc
    Aug 29, 10:15 AM
    UPDATE:

    It looks like the GMA X3000 is ready to go now, but a Yonah coupled with a X3000 IGP would still make the Mini a great machine.

    wow, now that would be something





    AppleScruff1
    Apr 23, 04:02 PM
    Who needs an undocumented source when you could watch WWDC 2010 Session 115 'Using Core Location in iOS 4' at 14 minutes and 30 seconds in and hear Morgan Grainger, a man partly responsible for the Core Location framework in the iPhone SDK (read: all location functionality on iPhone) describe how the iPhone caches nearby cell tower information to help the device find its location in the circumstances above.

    Given that we have the engineer partly behind this framework explain that the iPhone caches this information, we know that the iPhone has to be storing this information somewhere. This 'consolidated.db' matches the words in the video perfectly, making it no great assumption that this is the file which fulfils this purpose.

    Granted you don't sound like a developer and so won't have access to these videos, but any other developer could do the same and corroborate this.

    It being a bug is simply a rumour which has no links to an official source. I'm far more inclined to believe the words of a guy who wrote the code that collects this information in the first place

    It's all somewhat speculation until we hear Apples response.





    benjs
    Apr 12, 09:50 PM
    Definitely. For better or worse...

    The audio aligning features are going to be underrated but nice.

    Anyone who currently PluralEyes (myself included) will greatly appreciate this integration. PluralEyes, however, will not appreciate it.





    twoodcc
    Aug 24, 11:51 PM
    bring it on! i sure hope they release something





    tk421
    Jul 14, 12:23 AM
    Meh, Apple came out with that Express Card slot for the MacBook Pro kind of early as well...but I'm with most people in arguing that a blue-ray drive won't see the light of day in Apple computers until early 2007.

    Good point, and this isn't just with Express Card, either. Apple was an early adopter with 802.11b (with the original iBook, I think). They were early to drop the floppy drive, too.

    I for one would love a Blu-Ray drive, but I understand that others might not. They should make it a BTO option.





    AFPoster
    Mar 22, 01:07 PM
    His profile says he's the Director of IT. Who am I to question that?

    So I guess I can't be in the guard or reserve...