Popular Post
images %IMG_DESC_8% . %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • WaldenPond
    12-31 02:38 PM
    Here you go ....

    http://www.immigrationforum.org/documents/PolicyWire/Legislation/SpecterChairmanMark.pdf





    wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1% . %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • gc_on_demand
    09-09 12:03 PM
    IV has just now got a green light from our lobbyists. We need to start calling now.

    Someone please consolidate all information and create a campaign for this. Now is the time to follow up with anybody on the full committee with whom we have previously met or been in contact. Don�t call people who are already cosponsors. Only select people in the committee that are not co-sponsors. Make sure to say that you are a member of immigration voice so that it complements our lobbying efforts.

    Please pool your energies and create a list of people to call, phone numbers and what to say. Any moderator will add in the first post of this thread.

    Please keep posting your feedback on the thread when you have called. Once the campaign details are posted, post them on other websites too.


    Please make this thread sticky and create red flash iteam on home page





    . %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • mhathi
    01-10 11:43 AM
    It is not popular to say so but I have this doubt too.
    Currently at least there is no requirement to notify and you only need to prove you still have a similar job OFFER (not necessarily working) if and when there is an RFE.

    Only good thing happened to us in last decade, as far as I can remember, is AC21 and concurrent filing.

    All these immigration laws are designed to keep us indebted/bonded to the employer. They might see this as a liberating provision and try to chain us back. This may or may not happen, but just my paranoid reaction,.

    Hope AC21 don't go away like labor substitution has. :(

    That is naive... AC21 is not an administrative decision of USCIS... It is a law... AC21 = American Competitiveness in the 21st Century act!! It was passed by congress and the only body that can revoke it is congress.

    USCIS cannot revoke AC21.. only congress can. Please dont be paranoid. The most USCIS can do is refuse to change their current stance on same/similar job.

    Gurus, correct me if I am wrong.





    2011 %IMG_DESC_2% . %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • mundada
    01-24 02:54 PM
    There is a direct Air India service from JFK to Mumbai, painful commute if living in NJ but for those closer to JFK, this is the best flight they can have. The flight was recently launched, everyone has personal programming, Indian food, enough leg space etc. Surprisingly it is Air India! But then...



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • BharatPremi
    03-25 04:00 PM
    Right, we must avoid the word as much as possible. But then a lot of reqruiters and HRs now seem to educate themselves about the whole EAD thing and seem to be absolutely fine with the EAD.

    Yes, I would insist that jerk to refuse in writing but again ultimately I do not see any option except let it go and look for other oppertunity .

    I believe that as long as interviewing is concerned companies may have the right not to interview particular kind ("EAD holders" for an example) and interview particular kind ("GC Holder for an example..)

    And most of these jerks communicate this thing ("We do not consider "EAD Holder") verbally on phone but they do not dare to say that in writing. I dared one to send me that in writing and still I am waiting for his email after 4 to 5 followups:)





    . %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • buaya00
    09-11 04:51 PM
    Looks like the HR has adjourned till Sep 22 without HR5882 being discussed. Are they putting it off for later this year or next?

    Just noticed they updated the next session date to 15 sep and not 22 Sep.



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • chanduv23
    10-29 07:31 AM
    Dear IVans - there will be more discussions and analysis coming on IV in the coming days.

    At this time, please participate actively in this campaign.

    If anyone thinks that this does not affect me because my ex employer won't revoke 140 or I am having US masters or I work for best company or I have unique skills and whatever you think , you are making a big mistake by taking this issue for granted.

    AC21 Memos (Yates & Aytes Memos) are not legally binding. They are just USCIS guidelines and not legally-binding (on USCIS) regulations.

    So, potentially anyone can be a victim.





    2010 %IMG_DESC_3% . %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • SunnySurya
    08-07 09:22 AM
    Only way this can be stopped is if the pie gets bigger. If the pie remain the same , I will defend my piece.
    Only way (at least for now) the pie can get bigger if 5882 goes through...[/



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • gchope07
    06-21 09:18 PM
    In filing for I-485 no one has mentioned copy of I-140 or copy of Labor cert.

    My question is how does USCIS tally an AOS application to an already approved I-140 or labor certifcation and find out the PD for the application?





    hair %IMG_DESC_4% . %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • gc_on_demand
    08-21 10:54 AM
    I tend to agree with both.

    You need strong arguments and they need to have legal basis. Laws cannot be changed by an agency that only follows laws.

    If you are eligible for EB2 and cannot file in Eb2 and your employer filed in Eb3, it is not a strong argument. Likewise you cannot change the spillover rule without strong legal justification. You need change of law.
    Visa recapture is the best option.

    Any big action iteam coming for VISA RECAPTURE FROM IV CORE ?

    should't we start aggressive calling campaign for HR 5882 ? like one we did for sub committe hearing.. or may be big event like rally in DC ..



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • Hunter
    05-11 12:14 AM
    What are you showing hunter here? American hipocracy & bigotry in full light? How is your culture any good with what you have posted?
    Oh, did that comment on Brahma and Saraswati incest hurt you? tsk, tsk, tsk.. too bad.

    Well, you should have read and responded to the comment before that before pretending to be hurt about my response. I didn't start it.

    If you are ready to make such bigoted comment, NEVER expect that you can get away that. Believe me, internet is limitless and I can shovel dirt about India in this forum, if I want to with a google search(which is not my intent here)





    hot %IMG_DESC_5% . %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • Honda
    06-29 04:23 PM
    July Visa Bulletin to be revised?


    Please be advised that AILA, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, has just released the following announcement.



    "We are hearing from multiple sources that, on Monday or Tuesday of next week, State Department plans to issue a revised Visa Bulletin for July 2007. This revised Bulletin would retrogress some or all of the employment-based categories, very likely to the point of unavailable. Reports from AILA members about unusual levels and types of activities by USCIS indicate a particular push to adjudicate employment-based adjustments currently in the pipeline so as to exhaust visa numbers for fiscal year 2007.



    This follows the actions of USCIS in June, when it began rejecting EB-3 "Other Worker" adjustment applications even though the Visa Bulletin showed an October 2001 cut-off date, on the basis that the "Other Worker" numbers for the year had been exhausted.�



    If this is accurate, Adjustment of Status cases (I-485 cases) filed in July will all be rejected and returned to us and no AOS (I-485 cases) could be filed in July. It would also effectively cancel all Immigrant Visa appointments at US Consulates. We will provide further updates as they become available.




    Keep up with the latest Immigration News by signing up for all of Hammond Law Group LLC's free publications:

    Immigration Alerts, Medical Monthly Monitor and Business Immigration Quarterly.



    more...


    house %IMG_DESC_17% . %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • Hunter
    05-11 12:06 AM
    dude you are yet to show data to correlate students graduating correlating with H1 visa numbers. You say that Ms/Yahoo/Goog have no peers in India yet refuse to acknowledge these guys stand on visa status. You claim you have not found any indian with good maths skills but you can not explain the professors in top universities nor can you explain the number of phds there.

    See the url below.

    http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/training/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=215900774&subSection=H1B

    "The Computing Research Association's annual Taulbee Survey of 192 U.S. universities with doctoral programs found that total enrollment by majors and pre-majors in computer science increased 6.2% last year. If only declared majors are considered, the figure jumps to an 8.1% increase, the first boost in computer science majors in six years. "

    Are you happy now? Since H1-B quota is reduced, more students are considering computer science as a viable option. If H1-B is limited only for genuine requirements by american companies for the best and brightest and not used as displacing american companies by indian crooks from TCS/INFY etc., even more americans will go for those degrees.

    Are you satisfied? Now get lost!!


    No I would not attribute you as representative of us culture as i meet much better people in life everyday. you obviously think that your three trips to india gave you deep understanding of indian culture which is like saying you understood quantum theory in 1 min. you obviously are talking out of your ass. and if u think "arsha-bharata" makes any sense to vast majority here you are talking out of your ass.


    Go f*** urself. It was your fellow country-men (a jerk desparately trying to immigrate to US) who was making nonsense incest allegations first in this forum about americans. Do you get it,IDIOT, before lecturing me?

    I don't give a damn what your epics say or what you practice in India. All I pointed out was teh corruption in India pointed out by international agencies compared to western democracies.





    tattoo %IMG_DESC_6% . %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • jonty_11
    06-21 02:22 PM
    Let me help ArunANtonio here:

    Here are links to similar discussions for the last week or so.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5392&highlight=working+couple

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4998&highlight=working+couple

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5341&highlight=working+couple

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=5125&highlight=working+couple

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4974&highlight=working+couple



    more...


    pictures %IMG_DESC_7% . %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • pappu
    01-08 03:33 PM
    I will participate in this wholeheartedly. One suggestion to the admin: perhaps we can post this in other websites also like ? I know a lot of people use that site for posting problems etc and whoever is not in IV might also get to know about it.

    Good idea. Please feel free to post this information to as many websites, forums and blogs as possible. Please do not restrict yourself to websites in english language. If you know of websites in other languages frequented by EB immigrants, please post this information. The mantra for success in this effort is getting as many letters as we can.





    dresses %IMG_DESC_12% . %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • kuhelica2000
    11-22 03:17 PM
    Here is my take-

    Foreclosing on your house is asolutely legal in the USA. You can even declare personal bankruptcy if you are in a real mess.

    Ofcourse you need to evaluate the consequences of forclosing or declaring bankruptcy.

    Wall Street executives are cahsing in millions of dollars in bonuses while filing for bankruptcy. This is how the system works in a capitalist country. There is no place for morals and ethics in capitalism. It's all about playing by the rules.





    I had bought a house 2 years back thinking that i will sell it after couple of years and make money. I know many people might have done that. I didnt knwo that having a house will become a burden for me wrt moving to a different place in search of a job. I do see jobs in cities outside my state and was thinking of applying for those jobs. My problem is that if i sell my house, i will have to pay from my own pocket.
    Having a house in this market has become a pain as it has made me immobile with respect to good job offers.
    I was thinking that incase i find a job in a different state and cannot travel back home frequently and also renting is not a good option then should i leave the house to the bank for foreclosure?
    Will this affect my GC process. I have no plans of buying a house in coming years.
    What might be an outcome of foreclosure, keeping in mind that i am wiating for my GC process.
    If anyone had an experiecne like this or may know someone, please share ur thought..



    more...


    makeup %IMG_DESC_9% . %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • abhijitp
    01-10 07:08 PM
    You really cannot determine the achievable factor of a goal on a scale of 1 to 100 so that ordering is moot. In fact, there is some merit in keeping our most ambitious goals upfront - with enough support from the community we might just achieve them.

    Point noted.
    NorCal'ers as well as others, please act NOW... we can do it, IV can help!





    girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14% . %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • abhis0
    09-26 02:38 PM
    This is the same draft (I just changed the Dear.... senator./congressman/USCIS Assistant Inspector) for each and every email I sent out.
    Congressmen& Senator needs faxed copies with Date and Sign on it.
    Yes the same to the USCIS dept also. I got replies from Senator and Congressmen.. but nothing coming out of USCIS tight lips.

    Did congressman or senator's response sound pomising? I called up USCIS and same old response no data for ur application in our system...





    hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11% . %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • needhelp!
    01-08 01:25 PM
    Just finished it and made a photocopy for IV PO Box.. How many more are up to the hand written challenge? :D





    kumar4875
    03-31 10:10 AM
    Looks like this year USCIS understood they need some money and accept some extra applications, which may be the same file I485 when PD is not current. and date might go to end of 2007.
    Just a thought

    If it is for applications money, they might as well make it current.
    There are not many applications between Jan2008 and jan2011

    Cumulative
    Demand Prior To China India All OtherCountries Grand Total
    January 1, 2006 0 0 0 0
    January 1, 2007 4,200 13,200 0 17,400
    January 1, 2008 9,725 22,950 0 32,675
    January 1, 2011 9,800 23,050 100 32,950

    http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf





    omved
    07-09 06:34 PM
    http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f4b3076eb0f93110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=1958b0aaa86fa010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD